{"id":"reviewing-work-with-ai-agents","name":"Reviewing work with AI agents","tab":"Agents and AI","url":"https://yourlore.dev/marketplace/reviewing-work-with-ai-agents","pieces":[{"type":"piece","id":"876886fc9505d43c0fc6c355","market":"reviewing-work-with-ai-agents","market_name":"Reviewing work with AI agents","seller":"Dipak’s Working Lore","title":"How can a structured agent review catch central proof errors that a plain chat review missed, and what did it still overlook?","price_usd":1,"useful_if":"You want a concrete case of structured AI review catching proof errors that a chat review missed, and what it still missed.","not_useful_if":"You need accuracy across many papers; this is one case study.","sample":"In one qualitative n=1 case study, I ran Deep Review on version 1 of a publicly available ML preprint before examining its corrected version. The review calibrated against the paper's goals, split the work into proof, theory-to-practice, and empirical-design passes, used local code to test the theorem, and ran separate critique agents against the findings.","url":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/p/876886fc9505d43c0fc6c355","json":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/p/876886fc9505d43c0fc6c355.json","node":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/mcp","test":false,"updated":"2026-10-06"},{"type":"piece","id":"6b59ea98b178e27180629db8","market":"reviewing-work-with-ai-agents","market_name":"Reviewing work with AI agents","seller":"Dipak’s Working Lore","title":"How do you structure a coding agent to review a technical paper rigorously instead of in one shallow pass? The four-stage flow and the de-biasing trick behind it.","price_usd":1,"useful_if":"You want a coding agent to review a technical paper in depth, including checking theorems with code.","not_useful_if":"Your document is non-quantitative, with no claims to check.","sample":"Deep Review runs from a coding agent interface (Cowork, Codex). Flow: (1) a calibration interview asks what the artifact is, who the audience is, and where to focus.","url":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/p/6b59ea98b178e27180629db8","json":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/p/6b59ea98b178e27180629db8.json","node":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/mcp","test":false,"updated":"2026-10-06"},{"type":"piece","id":"c1d79e7871d599a5883748ca","market":"reviewing-work-with-ai-agents","market_name":"Reviewing work with AI agents","seller":"Dipak’s Working Lore","title":"When you need rigorous artifact review, which medium holds up — general AI chat, manual review, or a coding agent? The tradeoffs, and the one gap that decides it.","price_usd":1,"useful_if":"You need a rigorous review of a paper or technical document and are choosing between chat, manual review and a coding agent.","not_useful_if":"A quick skim is enough for your review.","sample":"The three review options each fall short: general AI chat reviews in a single pass, isn't specialized to inspect an artifact over tens of minutes, doesn't verify claims with code, and doesn't check its conclusions with an independent agent.","url":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/p/c1d79e7871d599a5883748ca","json":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/p/c1d79e7871d599a5883748ca.json","node":"https://lore.dipakrkrishnan.workers.dev/mcp","test":false,"updated":"2026-10-06"}]}